EDTL746-15S1 (D) Semester One 2015 (Distance)

Investigating Issues in Curriculum

15 points

Details:
Start Date: Monday, 23 February 2015
End Date: Sunday, 28 June 2015
Withdrawal Dates
Last Day to withdraw from this course:
  • Without financial penalty (full fee refund): Friday, 6 March 2015
  • Without academic penalty (including no fee refund): Friday, 22 May 2015

Description

This compulsory course is part of the transitional process for students upgrading from the DipT to BTchLn qualification. It explores the concept of curriculum and its application at both national and school/centre levels. Particular attention is given to curriculum changes since 1987 in New Zealand/Aotearoa. An in depth examination of curriculum models and issues is a focus of this course.

Learning Outcomes

  • By the end of this course successful students will be able to:
  • describe and critically analyse a model of curriculum development;
  • discuss and explore curriculum at a macro level (i.e. national curriculum guidelines) and at a micro level (i.e. the curriculum guidelines as they are interpreted in action in a school or early childhood centre);
  • reflect upon major developments in curriculum in Aotearoa/New Zealand, with particular reference to the reforms of the 1980s, up to the present in primary and early childhood education;
  • debate common issues in curriculum development and cross-curricular issues;
  • critically analyse issues that arose during the development of at least one national curriculum document or analyse issues across a sample of documents;
  • critically analyse a specific curriculum issue related to their place of work.

Equivalent Courses

TL746

Course Coordinator / Lecturer

Lawrence Walker

Assessment

Assessment Due Date Percentage 
Document Analysis 10 Apr 2015 50%
Action research Task 29 May 2015 50%

Textbooks / Resources

Recommended Reading

Adams, Paul , Vossler, Kathleen., Scrivens, Cushla; Teachers' work in Aotearoa New Zealand ; Thomson/Dunmore, 2005.

Bishop, Russell , Glynn, T; Culture counts : changing power relations in education ; Dunmore Press, 1999.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie , Mahoney, Maureen A; Influences on human development ; Dryden Press, 1972.

Carr, Margaret; Assessment in early childhood settings : learning stories ; Paul Chapman, 2001.

Haisman, Gilbert. et al; Questioning gender : snapshots from "Explaining and addressing gender differences in the New Zealand compulsory school sector : a literature review by Adrienne Alton-Lee and Angelique Praat" ; Ministry of Education, 2001.

Hatton, Elizabeth; Understanding teaching : curriculum and the social context of schooling ; 2nd ed; Harcourt Brace, 1998.

Hemara, Wharehuia. , New Zealand Council for Educational Research; Maori pedagogies : a view from the literature ; New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 2000.

Kemmis, Stephen , McTaggart, Robin, Deakin University; The Action research planner ; 3rd ed; Deakin University : distributed by Deakin University Press, 1988.

Marsh, Colin J; Key concepts for understanding curriculum ; Falmer Press, 1992.

May, Helen; Politics in the playground : the world of early childhood in postwar New Zealand ; Bridget Williams Books with the New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 2001.

McCulloch, Gary. , Richardson, William; Historical research in educational settings ; Open University, 2000.

Middleton, Sue , Codd, John A., Jones, Alison; New Zealand education policy today : critical perspectives ; Allen & Unwin, 1990.

Openshaw, Roger. , Adams, Paul, Hamer, Judy; Education and society in Aotearoa New Zealand ; 2nd ed; Thomson, 2005.

Apple, M. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Routledge.

Carr, M., Lee, W. & Jones, C. (2004). Children's contribution to their own assessment. Assessment for learning. Early childhood exemplars. Wellington: Ministry of Education, Learning Media.

Cullen, J. (1999). Children's knowledge, teachers' knowledge: Implications for early childhood teacher education. Australian Journal of teacher education. 24 (2). 15-25.

Goodson, I. (1988). The making of curriculum. Lewes: Falmer Press

Additional Course Outline Information

Academic integrity

All forms of cheating and dishonest practice are taken seriously and penalties will result. Students should refer to Regulation J of the General Course and Examination Regulations.

Assessment and grading system

There are two assignments for this course. Assignment 1 is 50% and assignment two 50%. They will be graded using the university A+ to E scale. Note: satisfactory completion of each assignment to at least a C- grade is required to pass the course.

Grading Scale
Grade    GPA Value        Marks

A+              9            90 – 100
A                8            85 – 89.99
A-               7            80 – 84.99
B+              6            75 – 79.99
B                5            70 – 74.99
B-               4            65 – 69.99
C+              3            60 – 64.99
C                2            55 – 59.99
C-               1            50 – 54.99
D                0            40 – 49.99
E               -1             0 – 39.99

A Pass is 50 marks or over

Attendance

Students must check their UC emails and log into Learn site. Distance students must participate in the course via Learn to meet the learning outcomes.  Students are responsible for obtaining relevant lecture/course information via Learn. This will mean regular engagement with forums and course materials on the Learn site. Participation will enhance your understanding of issues and allow for discussion and clarification of complex issues. Online activity will ensure all students can discuss, debate and reflect. Insufficient participation in the course will jeopardise students passing the course.

Evaluation

Formal and informal evaluation will take place in accordance with the relevant Course Evaluation Policy, to provide feedback to teaching staff about the relevance and validity of what has been learned as well as the quality of course delivery

Grade moderation

An examiners’ meeting will be held at the end of the course to determine final grades and ensure fairness and consistency.

Late submission of work

Assignments submitted by email, drop-box or any other online repository after the due date, with no extension granted, are considered 'late'. 'Late' work may be accepted up to one week after the due date and a grade penalty will be incurred. Late work is not eligible for resubmission. Markers reserve the right not to mark late work.

Other specific requirements

Assessments in this course may require practical application of course content in the participant’s teaching context. Students should ensure they have access to infants, toddlers, or young children for these purposes. See “General guide to the presentation of assignments” in course outline.
Do not use folders or ring binders to present your work. This makes it hard for the marker to add comments and greatly increases postage costs.
Keep a copy of all work.

Requests for extensions

Students are expected to plan work in advance to meet assessment deadlines. A grace period for submission of work is built into due dates as per schedule set out above. In exceptional circumstances, a student needing to negotiate alternative due dates must contact the upgrade coordinator before the due dates stated above. Such requests will not be granted automatically.

Resubmissions

If your work meets most (but not all) of the criteria required to pass, you may be given the opportunity to resubmit an assessment to bring it to a passing standard. Resubmissions are restricted to work that is originally submitted on or before the due date. Late assignments will not be considered for resubmission. Distance students will have ten days from expected receipt date to complete resubmissions. The original work and marking sheet must be attached to the resubmitted version. A resubmitted assignment that meets the requirements will be awarded a minimum passing grade. Only one resubmit is permitted for each assignment. A resubmitted assignment that does not meet passing standard will be awarded a D. NOTE: It may not be possible to allow resubmissions of the final assignment if this would compromise the ability of markers to meet deadlines for the submission of final course grades.

Where to submit and collect work

Students will be expected to submit their assessments via the online assessment system in the Learn class site by 5.00pm on or before the due date. The lecturer may also ask students to submit assessment work through the software Turnitin, to check for plagiarism. If this option is available students will submit work through Turnitin and obtain a report, after submitting assignments for marking via the Learn site. It is the responsibility of the students to check their Internet access and ability to submit their work via the online system.  Any technical difficulties should be notified well in advance of the due date so that assistance can be provided or alternative arrangements can be negotiated. (Students who do not have broadband internet access, or who have unreliable access are advised to attend to this early in the course to prevent last minute pressures.) If you require assistance, please email ictservicedesk@canterbury.ac.nz, or phone 0800 763 676 ext 6060.

Indicative Fees

Domestic fee $697.00

International fee $2,913.00

* All fees are inclusive of NZ GST or any equivalent overseas tax, and do not include any programme level discount or additional course-related expenses.

For further information see School of Teacher Education .

All EDTL746 Occurrences

  • EDTL746-15S1 (D) Semester One 2015 (Distance)